Photos of the FIRST LEGO League state qualifying tournament taken on November 15, 2008.
Photo from the Harvest Fest that took place at the White House in Emet, Oklahoma. Events included guided tours of the White House, carriage/buggy rides, Lynn Moroney doing traditional storytelling, the Ada Free Rangers performing wild west shows, bluegras
Photos from Youth Heritage Day conducted at the Tishomingo Wildlife Refuge. Students were able to see the culture of the Chickasaw people through demonstrations.
On November 16, 1990, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) became law. This law, sections 3001 through 3015 of Volume 25 of the United States Code, "Establishes procedures and legal standards for the repatriation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and cultural patrimony by federal agencies and certain museums, educational and other institutions, and state and local governments. Recognizes certain tribal, Native Hawaiian and individual rights in regard to burial sites located on federal and tribal lands. In general, the Act is based upon the unique relationship between Native Americans and the federal government."1
NAGPRA provides various repatriation, ownership and control rights to Native American individuals and families who are lineal descendents of a deceased native individual and to Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations.
Cultural Items
NAGPRA deals with the issue of ownership and control over Native American "cultural items." "Cultural items" are defined to include human remains, associated and unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony. The meaning of each of the categories of items is as follows:
ENDNOTES
1. 25 U.S.C. 3010.
2. 25 U.S.C. 3001 (7)
3. Abenaki Nation of Mississquoi v. Hughes, 20 I.L.R. 3001 (D. Vt. 1992)
4. For example, the Confederated Salish and Kottenai tribes govern the Flathead Resevation Jointly. However, the Salish and Kootanai have their own distinct cultures and separate mechanisms for making decisions regarding traditional matters. The most reasonable interpretation of the definition of "Indian Tribe," read in conjunction with the remainder of the Statute, would be an interpretation that permits both the Salish and Kootenenai to make independent claims under NAGPRA.
5. 25 U.S.C. 3001(11).
6. 25 U.S.C.3001(4); 20U.S.C. 80q-9.
7. 25 U.S.C.3001(3)(A).
8. 25 U.S.C.3001(3)(B).
9. 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(C).
10. H.R.Rep.No.877, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess (1990), at 14.
11. 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(D).
12. S. Rep. No. 473, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. (1990), at 7-8.